They pay for workshops where dozens of people can join and everything still works.
REPLACEMENT BRIEF
whiteboards
Can AI replace Miro?
Build a canvas with sticky notes, shapes, connectors, comments, and optional multiplayer sync.
Build the personal version →AT A GLANCE
- price
- $10/mo
- listed annual price
- $120/yr
- replaceable scope
- Build a canvas with sticky notes, shapes, connectors, comments, and optional multiplayer sync.
- build time
- multi-day
what AI can build
Build a canvas with sticky notes, shapes, connectors, comments, and optional multiplayer sync.
A simple multiplayer whiteboard is doable; Miro's value is scale, templates, integrations, facilitation, permissions, and reliability with many users.
The prompt was editor-reviewed; no completed build is recorded.
The honest tradeoff
why people still pay
what you lose
xlarge-board performance
xtemplates
xintegrations
xfacilitation tools
xpermissions
xenterprise controls
Start with existing software
prior art · use these instead of building, if you'd rather
EVIDENCE LEDGER
What this page can prove
The verdict judges replaceability. The evidence level records what DeepFeather actually checked.
The prompt was editor-reviewed; no completed build is recorded.
Starter · monthly per seat
known limits · large-board performance; templates
Build promptreviewed prompt · not run
the prompt
Curated promptBuild me a personal whiteboard app to replace Miro. Requirements: - Do not write a canvas engine from scratch: build on the tldraw SDK (React + Vite). It already does shapes, sticky notes, connectors, and selection well. - A local web app on localhost:4900 with a board picker: named boards with thumbnails, create, rename, delete. - Each board autosaves its tldraw snapshot JSON to SQLite (better-sqlite3 behind a small Express API) 2 seconds after the last change, keeping the previous 20 snapshots as undo insurance. - A toolbar button exports the current board as PNG and SVG to ~/Whiteboards/<board-name>.png. - A template row on the new-board screen seeded from JSON files in templates/: retro grid, brainstorm columns, weekly plan. - Works fully offline, binds to localhost, no accounts, no telemetry. - Optional: share-with-one-person mode over my private network using tldraw's sync package, two cursors max. Skip it if it costs more than an hour. - Out of scope: workshop facilitation tools (timers, voting), integrations, and performance tuning for 50-person boards. This is my thinking canvas, not a venue. - README: dev and build commands, and where board data lives on disk.
The prompt stays readable first. Choose a launch option when you are ready.
$ open in your agent (prompt prefilled, you press enter) or copy it raw
BUILD FEEDBACK
Did you try this build?
Report the outcome. Submissions enter a manual evidence queue and never auto-upgrade the verdict.
Want next week’s replacements?
New verdicts + most-wanted, weekly. Free. One-click out.
Share this verdict
questions
Can AI replace Miro?
Possibly for a narrower core workflow, but this catalog judgment is not a verified build. Expected gaps include: large-board performance, templates. Validate the prompt against your own acceptance criteria before committing.
How much does Miro cost?
Miro is listed at about $10/month (Starter, checked 2026-07-30), or $120 per year. This is a pricing reference, not evidence of a completed replacement or realized savings.
What do I lose by replacing Miro?
Honestly: large-board performance; templates; integrations; facilitation tools; permissions; enterprise controls. If any of those are load-bearing for you, keep paying.
Is there an open-source alternative to Miro?
Yes — tldraw (Open-source canvas/whiteboard SDK and app; excellent prior art for DIY whiteboards.). Using prior art is also a valid exit; the prompt is for when you want it exactly your way.