Can AI replace Shade?

KINDA · weekend project
price $35/moyou'd save $420/yrbuild time multi-daycategory 🎬 audio & videoreplaced by 0 peoplebuild unverified

The search half is real and rebuildable. Extract keyframes with ffmpeg, embed them with CLIP, transcribe the audio with whisper, put the vectors in SQLite, and 'the drone shot over the bridge at golden hour' finds the clip on your own drives. The open-source stack for that is mature and the result is genuinely good. What does not survive the port is what Shade has grown into: cloud streaming so an editor opens full-res without waiting on a download, per-link permissions and guest access, review and approval, and a model pipeline that keeps improving without you retraining anything. Solo, on local storage, the DIY version wins outright. On a team, you are rebuilding a platform and calling it a script.

the prompt
Build me a semantic search engine for my own footage to replace Shade. Requirements:

- A Python CLI plus a small FastAPI web UI on localhost. SQLite with sqlite-vec for
  the vectors and the metadata, one file at ~/FootageIndex/index.db.
- `index <folder>` walks the tree, and for every video ffmpeg pulls a keyframe every
  5 seconds plus one at each scene cut detected by the ffmpeg scene filter.
- Each keyframe is embedded with open_clip (ViT-B/32) and stored with its timestamp.
  Stills and photos get the same treatment as a single frame.
- Audio goes through whisper.cpp for a transcript with word timestamps, chunked into
  30-second windows and embedded with sentence-transformers for text search.
- The search box takes a plain sentence and searches image and transcript vectors
  together, returning ranked results as thumbnail, filename, and timecode. Clicking
  one opens the clip at that exact frame in a player.
- Indexing is incremental and resumable, keyed on file path plus mtime plus size, and
  prints a running count so an overnight run is checkable in the morning.
- Everything runs on my machine, models included · no accounts, no cloud, no
  telemetry, no API keys. Files are read only, never moved or renamed.
- Out of scope: face recognition, sharing links, review and comments, and team sync.
  Do not build auth or a server deployment, this is a single-user local tool.
- README: installing ffmpeg and whisper.cpp, first-run model downloads, an honest
  estimate of indexing hours per TB on CPU versus GPU, and how to reset the index.

$ open in your agent (prompt prefilled, you press enter) or copy it raw

why people still pay

They pay because the search only matters if the whole team gets it. A local index that only lives on the editor's machine solves the editor's problem and nobody else's, and the person who most needs to find the clip is usually the one furthest from the storage. Shade sells the index plus the delivery of what the index found, and the second half is the expensive one.

what you lose

xcloud streaming of full-res files without downloading them first

xguest links with per-link permissions and roles

xbuilt-in review, approval, and commenting

xface recognition and shot-type tagging that improves without your involvement

xteam sync, so everyone searches the same index

xthe NLE plugins and Slack integration

prior art · use these instead of building, if you'd ratherImmichSelf-hosted photo and video library with CLIP semantic search and face recognition already built in. The closest working proof the search half is solved.PhotoPrismSelf-hosted AI-tagged media library with local indexing and search. Photo-first, but the same pattern.
share on X ↗"I just replaced Shade ($35/mo) with one prompt"
questions
Can AI replace Shade?

Kinda. The core of Shade is buildable in a weekend with the prompt on this page, but there are real gaps: cloud streaming of full-res files without downloading them first, guest links with per-link permissions and roles. Read the honest list above before committing.

How much does Shade cost?

Shade costs about $35/month (Growth, checked 2026-07-30), which is $420 per year.

What do I lose by replacing Shade?

Honestly: cloud streaming of full-res files without downloading them first; guest links with per-link permissions and roles; built-in review, approval, and commenting; face recognition and shot-type tagging that improves without your involvement; team sync, so everyone searches the same index; the NLE plugins and Slack integration. If any of those are load-bearing for you, keep paying.

Is there an open-source alternative to Shade?

Yes — Immich (Self-hosted photo and video library with CLIP semantic search and face recognition already built in. The closest working proof the search half is solved.), PhotoPrism (Self-hosted AI-tagged media library with local indexing and search. Photo-first, but the same pattern.). Using prior art is also a valid exit; the prompt is for when you want it exactly your way.